Funny Movies
WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP
+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW - NOW!!!+++This, my friends, is the ultimate clip regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all been waiting for. All the lies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled together, brilliantly done, with some great "extra" material. +++This clip is now also online with Spanish subtitles - spread the message!! LINK:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Am0vKUJy9U+++Background music: THE KILLERS: ALL THE THINGS THAT I HAVE DONE+++___ATTENTION: A shortened version without swearwords is now online - so that you can post this clip in forums in which swearwords are not allowed:http://youtube.com/watch?v=0L5ZQ1usR-w___Thanks a lot to my friend Sally from California for bringing this clip to my attention!Make sure that at the next elections this bunch of liars gets thrown out of the White House - forever and ever.This clip was created by:http://www.puppetgov.com---By the way: In this scene when Cheney says "it's pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and met with Iraqi officials", Cheney was referring to Mohammed Atta.---+++STAND UP, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!!+++NOTE: You have watched this clip, and you are STILL not convinced that Bush did anything wrong? Then you should read about the already infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" - exposing that the West knew very well that Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was ILLEGAL.Links:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article387374.ecehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memoExcerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about the Cabinet meeting on 23rd July 2002):"(...)C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.(...)It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change."+++UPDATE+++Here is another link proving the lies:http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sidney_blumenthal/2007/09/turning_truth_into_lies.html
Watched: 280584 times
Comments: 4121
Tags: lies wmd george bush dick cheney donald rumsfeld rice wolfowitz rove powell impeach iraq war cia intelligence kucinich barack obama sarah palin
Page 1 z 323 
Page 1 z 323